1. | FORMATION OF COMPANY AND NATURE OF
OPERATIONS |
| | TEAL Exploration & Mining Incorporated (TEAL or the Company) is
the holding company of a group of exploration and mining
companies previously owned by African Rainbow Minerals Limited
(ARM), a company incorporated in South Africa. These companies
comprise exploration and development of mineral assets situated
in Namibia, Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
ARM incorporated TEAL under the laws of the Yukon Territory on June 1, 2005. On November 15, 2005,TEAL entered into a Share and Asset Transfer Agreement with ARM and acquired the common shares and other assets comprising the mineral rights, mining and exploration permits and related assets of ARMs non-South African minerals and exploration interests (see note 9). These companies are held through Barbados, Zambian and South African incorporated holding companies.
The Company is a development stage enterprise that has yet to generate revenues from its projects. The development of these projects involves significant financial risk. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis that the Company is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations.
TEALs subsidiaries and branches, which are all 100% owned, unless otherwise specified, are:
Barbados
TEAL Exploration & Mining (B) Incorporated.
TEAL Namibia (B) Inc.
Copperbelt (B) Inc.
Konnoco (B) Inc.
Lukali Holdings (B) Inc.
TEAL Holdings (B) Inc.
Katanga (B) Inc.
Kasonta (B) Inc.
TEAL Bazaruto (B) Incorporated.
TEAL Lubumbashi (B) Incorporated.
TEAL Etoile (B) Incorporated.
South Africa
TEAL Exploration & Mining Incorporated (branch registered as permanent establishment in South Africa)
TEAL Exploration and Mining Investment Holdings (Pty) Limited
Zambia
Mwambashi Holdings Zambia Limited
Konnoco Holdings Zambia Limited
Millberg Holdings Zambia Limited
TEAL Group Zambia Limited
Katanga Holdings Zambia Limited
TEAL (Zambia) Limited (formerly ARM (Zambia) Limited)
TEAL Development (Zambia) Limited (formerly ARM Development (Zambia) Limited)
TEAL Venture Limited (formerly ARM Venture Limited)
TEAL Exploration (Zambia) Limited (formerly ARM Exploration (Zambia) Limited)
Konnoco Zambia Limited
Namibia
TEAL Namibia (Pty) Limited (formerly African Rainbow Minerals Development (Pty) Limited and previously Avmin Namibia (Pty) Limited)
Avdale Namibia (Pty) Limited
Democratic Republic of Congo
TEAL Mining (DRC) s.p.r.l (formerly AVCO s.p.r.l)
Kasonta Lupoto Mines s.p.r.l (60% owned)
TEAL Metals (DRC) s.p.r.l
|
| | |
2. |
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND GOING CONCERN |
| |
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
for a going concern enterprise, which contemplates the
realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and
commitments in the normal course of business. The Company
has incurred a net loss of US$27,266,000 (2006:
US$9,016,000) and at the reporting date had a deficit
accumulated during the exploration stage of US$37,358,000.
The Company has not generated any revenue, has a
substantial accumulated deficit and working capital deficiency
and requires additional funds to maintain its exploration
activities. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
group’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The Group has secured a one year bridging loan facility with Standard Chartered Bank for US$20,000,000 which is being guaranteed by TEALs major shareholder, ARM, and is repayable on May 23, 2008.
Subsequent to year-end, ARM has agreed to increase the guarantee to US$50,000,000, subject to South African Reserve Bank approval, which will ensure that TEAL has a facility in place beyond the end of the 2008 financial year or until long-term funding is arranged. TEAL is currently negotiating the terms, including an extension beyond the one-year time-frame, with Standard Chartered Bank.
The funds will be directed mainly towards work supporting studies on TEALs major projects thereby creating sufficient flexibility for the company to maximize value from its existing portfolio, specifically: the Konkola North copper mine and Kalumines mine and smelter projects, as well as the Otjikoto Gold Project. Appropriate funding to refinance the bridging facilities and fund the developmental expenditure at Konkola North, Kalumines and Otjikoto will be arranged after the completion of the final feasibility studies.
These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of the uncertainty.
|
| |
|
3. |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
| |
The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements of TEAL have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and are presented in United States dollars.
The significant accounting policies of the Company are summarized as follows:
a)
|
Basis of consolidation
|
| |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation.
|
b)
|
Use of estimates
|
| |
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions, which affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at that date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses for the periods reported. Management has made a number of significant estimates and valuation assumptions, including the useful lives of capital assets and determination of accruals. By their nature, these estimates are subject to measurement uncertainty and the effect of the consolidated financial statements of changes in such estimates in future periods could be significant. Actual results will likely differ from those estimates.
|
c)
|
Exploration and evaluation costs
|
| |
Exploration and development costs are expensed as incurred. Exploration costs include value-added taxes incurred in foreign jurisdictions when recoverability of those taxes is uncertain. When it has been established that a mineral deposit is commercially mineable and a decision has been made to formulate a mining plan (which occurs upon completion of a positive economic analysis of the mineral deposit), the costs subsequently incurred to develop the mine on the property prior to the start of mining operations are capitalized. Capitalized amounts may be written down if future undiscounted cash flows, including potential sale proceeds, related to a mineral property are estimated to be less than the carrying value of the property.
|
d)
|
Mineral property acquisition costs
|
| |
Mineral property acquisition costs are capitalized until the viability of the mineral interest is determined. Capitalized acquisition costs are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the mineral property has no future economic value.
Capitalized amounts may be written down if future cash flows, including potential sales proceeds, related to the property are estimated to be less than the carrying value of the property. Management reviews the carrying value of each mineral property interest periodically. Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable, reductions in the carrying value of each property would be recorded to the extent the carrying value exceeds the estimated future cash flows.
|
e)
|
Foreign currency transactions and balances
|
| |
All the operations of the group have a US dollar functional currency. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies have been translated into United States dollars at the period end exchange rates. Non-monetary assets have been translated at the rates prevailing at the dates of acquisition. Revenue and expense items other than depreciation are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing for the period. Any exchange gain or loss that arises on translation is included in the determination of net loss for the period.
|
f)
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
| |
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost, less depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization of capital assets, that have been placed in service is calculated on a straight line basis over the following terms:
| Buildings |
50 years |
| Plant |
10 years |
| Vehicles |
5 years |
| Office furniture and equipment |
3 6 years |
| Land is not depreciated |
|
|
g)
|
Leases
|
| |
Finance leases, which transfer to the TEAL Group substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item, are capitalized at the inception of the lease at the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged directly against income.
Operating lease payments are recognized as an expense in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease agreement.
|
h)
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
| |
Cash equivalents include those short term money market instruments, which have an original term to maturity of three months or less when acquired.
|
i)
|
Revenue recognition
|
| |
Revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that economic benefits will flow to the Company and the revenue can be reliably measured. Incidental revenue is set off against related project and exploration expenditure.
Interest
Revenue is recognized as the interest accrues.
|
j)
|
Impairment
|
| |
The carrying value of assets is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated. Where the carrying value exceeds the estimated undiscounted cash flows from the use of the assets, such assets are written down to their recoverable amount.
|
k)
|
Income taxes
|
| |
Income taxes are provided for in accordance with the liability method. Under the liability method of accounting for income taxes, future tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the substantively enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. If on the basis of available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the future tax asset will not be realized, the future tax asset is reduced by a valuation allowance.
|
l)
|
Joint ventures
|
| |
Joint venture arrangements in which the companies within the TEAL Group have a controlling stake are consolidated as though they are subsidiaries. Unincorporated joint ventures are accounted for net of joint venture partner contributions. Arrangements whereby the TEAL Group is incurring costs in order to earn a stake in a project are accounted for by expensing the costs until the interest is earned. The entity in which the interest is earned is then consolidated if the TEAL Group has control, equity accounted if the TEAL Group has significant influence, or proportionately consolidated if there is joint control.
|
m)
|
Loss per common share
|
| |
Basic loss per share
The loss per common share is calculated as the consolidated loss for the period, divided by the weighted average number of common shares.
Diluted loss per share
Diluted loss comprises loss as used in calculating basic loss per share. The loss figure is divided by the weighted average number of common shares, adjusted for any financial instruments or other contracts that entitle the holder thereof to ordinary shares, to arrive at diluted loss per share. No diluted loss per share is calculated if all share issuances are anti-dilutive.
|
n)
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
| |
Asset retirement obligation relates to TEALs legal obligation to remove exploration equipment and other assets from its mineral property sites and to perform other site reclamation work. Site closure costs are capitalized when incurred and reviewed for impairment on an annual basis.
|
o)
|
Stock based compensation
|
| |
The TEAL Group accounts for stock appreciation rights granted to directors, officers, employees and non-employees of the group as equity settled using the fair value method of accounting. The fair value of share appreciation rights at their grant dates are determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, as required by generally accepted accounting principles and expensed over the vesting period.
|
p)
|
Employee benefits
|
| |
The TEAL Group contributes to a defined contribution pension scheme, which contributions are made to a separately administered fund.
|
q)
|
Comparative amounts
|
| |
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current years presentation.
|
r)
|
Inventory |
| |
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value with due allowance being made for obsolete and slow moving items. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated cost of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Raw materials are valued at weighted average cost.
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS
|
| |
| For the year ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
| (In thousands of United States Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Depreciation |
|
Net loss |
|
Total assets |
| |
|
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| The Company is organized and managed geographically. Currently this includes the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Zambia and Namibia, which reflects the following in terms of depreciation, net losses and total assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DRC |
63 |
|
7,141 |
|
8,546 |
| |
Zambia |
33 |
|
9,244 |
|
509 |
| |
Namibia |
29 |
|
3,844 |
|
517 |
| |
Holding companies |
74 |
|
7,037 |
|
4,541 |
| |
|
199 |
|
27,266 |
|
14,113 |
| |
As at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DRC |
2 |
|
83 |
|
297 |
| |
Zambia |
28 |
|
1,901 |
|
210 |
| |
Namibia |
10 |
|
1,897 |
|
126 |
| |
Holding companies |
5 |
|
6,211 |
|
26,860 |
| |
|
45 |
|
10,092 |
|
27,493 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
|
|
|
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| |
The following is a summary of exploration and development costs incurred by the Company related to its mineral property interests for the years ended June 30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, respectively: |
|
|
|
|
| |
DRC |
|
|
|
|
| |
Drilling |
|
902 |
|
|
| |
Transportation |
|
321 |
|
48 |
| |
Contractors and personnel |
|
1,681 |
|
128 |
| |
Feasibility studies |
|
334 |
|
|
| |
Other exploration and development costs |
|
1,617 |
|
|
| |
Other overheads and allocated costs |
|
2,775 |
|
6 |
| |
Total |
|
7,630 |
|
182 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Zambia |
|
|
|
|
| |
Drilling |
|
2,633 |
|
1,152 |
| |
Transportation |
|
313 |
|
317 |
| |
Contractors and personnel |
|
1,491 |
|
1,312 |
| |
Feasibility studies |
|
1,042 |
|
|
| |
Other exploration and development costs |
|
2,871 |
|
|
| |
Other overheads and allocated costs |
|
3,888 |
|
474 |
| |
Total |
|
12,238 |
|
3,255 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Namibia |
|
|
|
|
| |
Drilling |
|
1,358 |
|
945 |
| |
Transportation |
|
38 |
|
130 |
| |
Contractors and personnel |
|
840 |
|
781 |
| |
Feasibility studies |
|
45 |
|
186 |
| |
Other exploration and development costs |
|
1,219 |
|
|
| |
Other overheads and allocated costs |
|
807 |
|
435 |
| |
Total |
|
4,307 |
|
2,477 |
| |
Total exploration and development costs |
|
24,175 |
|
5,914 |
| |
Exploration and development costs in Zambia include expenditures incurred on all the Zambian projects being Konkola North, the Copperbelt Joint Venture, the Kafue Joint Venture and Mwambashi. In Namibia, exploration and development costs comprise expenditure incurred on the Otjikoto Gold Project and general exploration work in the Greater Otavi Area. Exploration and development costs in the DRC reflect the establishment and staffing of an office to advance the resource and exploration program. Other exploration and development costs include feasibility costs on Konkola North and Mwambashi (in Zambia) and Kalumines (in DRC). |
|
| |
|
5.
|
JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENTS
|
| |
a)
|
Mwambashi Copper Project (TEAL 70%)
|
| |
The Mwambashi Copper Project is situated within a large scale prospecting licence number 72. Korea Zinc Company, Limited (KZC) has a right to 30% participating interest in the project. Funding is mandatory for both parties, except with respect to declared project areas set aside for specific evaluation and development, in which case a party may withdraw or dilute its interest by failing to fund. The Mwambashi Copper Project was declared a project area in the previous financial year. Neither of the parties participating interests have been diluted to date, although negotiations are in process between the parties that may affect the current respective participating interests.
|
b)
|
Copperbelt Joint Venture Exploration Area (TEAL 70%)
|
| |
The area consists of five large scale prospecting licences (one of which contains the Mwambashi Copper Project above) and is subject to a joint venture agreement with KZC granting them a 30% participating interest. Neither of the parties interests have been diluted to date, although negotiations are in process between the parties that may affect the current respective participating interests.
|
c)
|
Kafue Joint Venture Exploration Area (TEAL 51%)
|
| |
The area consists of three exclusive exploration licences and each is subject to a separate joint venture agreement with Billiton Development (Zambia) Limited (BHP), a subsidiary of BHP Billiton plc. TEAL has met the vesting requirements with regard to two of the licences. It is TEALs intention to continue with further exploration work on these licences. BHP is required to make a participation decision with regards to these two licences. Should they elect to participate they will have to contribute their 49% share of expenditure. Meanwhile TEAL is continuing with exploration activities to meet its vesting requirements with regards to the third licence.
|
d)
|
Kalumines Copper-Cobalt Project (TEAL 60%)
|
| |
The Kalumines Copper-Cobalt Project consists of one mining licence held by TEALs 60% owned subsidiary Kasonta Lupoto Mines s.p.r.l (Kalumines). The remaining 40% is held by Gécamines which contributed all of the mining rights to the area. TEAL is responsible for conducting and funding a feasibility study on Kalumines to retain its interest. Thereafter TEAL must arrange all financing for the development of a mine should a development decision be taken. |
|
| |
|
6.
|
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
|
| |
| |
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| Ground rent 1 |
538 |
|
501 |
| Other |
3,139 |
|
1,300 |
| |
3,677 |
|
1,801 |
| 1 |
Ground rent on surface rights held by Konnoco Zambia Limited payable in terms of the Lands Act, Chapter 185 of the Laws of Zambia. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
7.
|
SHORT TERM BORROWINGS
|
| |
| |
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| Standard Chartered Bank |
10,022 |
|
|
| Short term portion of long term liability
|
6 |
|
|
| |
10,028 |
|
|
| The loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.5% and is repayable on May 23, 2008. It is collateralized by a guarantee from ARM.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
8.
|
LONG-TERM BORROWINGS
|
| |
| |
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| Financial lease* |
16 |
|
|
| Asset retirement obligation |
34 |
|
|
| |
50 |
|
|
| * |
Long term portion of financial lease repayable in 36 monthly instalments at an interest rate linked to South African prime rate (at year end 12.5%).Secured with motor vehicle with book value of US$25,000. |
|
|
|
| |
|
9.
|
SHARE CAPITAL
|
| |
| Authorized |
| The Company has unlimited authorized common shares of no par value. |
| Issued |
|
Number |
|
Value |
| |
|
|
|
$ 000 |
| June 1, 2005 |
On incorporation |
1 |
|
|
| November 15, 2005 |
On acquisition of exploration and mineral properties (note 1) |
35,000,000 |
|
|
| November 15, 2005 |
By initial public offering |
17,800,000 |
|
31,268 |
| December 14, 2005 |
Over allotment exercised |
1,100,000 |
|
1,995 |
| December 18, 2006 |
New issue in lieu of SARs grants exercised |
10,909 |
|
48 |
| |
|
53,910,910 |
|
33,311 |
On November 4, 2005, TEAL filed a final prospectus with all provincial and territorial securities regulatory authorities in Canada and completed an initial public offering (IPO) on November 15,2005.The Company issued 17.8 million treasury common shares at Cdn$2.25 per share for aggregate proceeds of Cdn$37.5 million, net of expenses.
As part of the IPO, TEAL had granted the underwriting syndicate an option to purchase up to 2.67 million additional common shares. The option was exercisable, in whole or in part, within 30 days from November 15, 2005 to cover over-allotments. On December 14, 2005, it was announced that the underwriters had purchased 1.1 million treasury common shares from TEAL at the IPO price of Cdn.$2.25 per share for net proceeds of Cdn$2.3 million. This brought the total net proceeds raised from the IPO to Cdn$39.8 million, or US$33.3 million.
TEAL listed on the JSE Limited as a secondary listing by way of an introduction of all of the TEAL common shares with effect from April 3, 2006. No new shares were issued at this time.
A further 10,909 shares were issued in December 2006 at Cdn$4.95 following the exercise of share appreciation rights by a non executive director.
|
| |
|
10.
|
CONTRIBUTED SURPLUS
|
| |
| For the year ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
| (In thousands of United States Dollars) |
|
|
|
| |
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| The contributed surplus is comprised as follows: |
|
|
|
| Balance June 30, 2006 (2005) |
1,947 |
|
|
| Stock-based compensation expense |
2,288 |
|
1,947 |
| Transfer to share capital for exercise of stock options |
(48) |
|
|
| Balance June 30, 2007 (2006) |
4,187 |
|
1,947 |
Participation in the Groups stock based compensation plan is voluntary. Share appreciation rights granted under the plan are non-transferable other than in accordance with the rules of the plan and must be exercised no later than eight years after the date of the grant or such shorter period as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. All grants are subject to a vesting schedule whereby 40% of any award will vest on the second anniversary of the grant with 30% of any award vesting on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the date of the grant except for grants to non-executive directors, which vest on date of grant.
A maximum of 5,352,000 (2006:4,752,000) common shares are available for issuance upon the exercise of share appreciation rights granted under the plan. Certain restrictions on the plan apply, including the maximum number of common shares that may be granted to any individual within a 12 month period cannot exceed 5% of the number of outstanding common shares.
The contributed surplus arose from the issue of share appreciation rights to employees of the Company adjusted to fair value as follows:
| |
Number |
|
Exercise |
|
Fair |
| |
of |
|
price |
|
value |
| |
rights |
|
(Cdn$) |
|
(Cdn$) |
| *Rights granted November 15, 2005 |
4,594,136 |
|
2.25 |
|
1.59 |
| Rights granted February 9, 2006 |
94,496 |
|
3.03 |
|
2.14 |
| Rights granted May 29, 2006 |
36,222 |
|
4.92 |
|
3.48 |
| Balance June 30, 2006 |
4,724,854 |
|
2.29 |
|
1.62 |
| Rights granted July 1, 2006 |
164,907 |
|
4.74 |
|
2.81 |
| Rights granted July 17, 2006 |
26,278 |
|
4.54 |
|
2.69 |
| Rights granted August 1, 2006 |
36,896 |
|
4.60 |
|
2.73 |
| Rights granted August 29, 2006 |
24,631 |
|
4.51 |
|
2.67 |
| Rights granted November 14, 2006 |
524,445 |
|
4.13 |
|
2.45 |
| Rights granted January 30, 2007 |
145,000 |
|
3.98 |
|
2.36 |
| Rights granted March 16, 2007 |
41,256 |
|
3.99 |
|
2.37 |
| Rights granted March 29, 2007 |
58,781 |
|
3.94 |
|
2.34 |
| Rights granted April 23, 2007 |
35,547 |
|
3.79 |
|
2.19 |
| Rights forfeited during the year |
(681,778) |
|
2.25 |
|
1.59 |
| Rights exercised during the year |
(20,000) |
|
2.25 |
|
1.59 |
| Balance June 30, 2007 |
5,080,817 |
|
2.69 |
|
1.80 |
| * |
Includes 393,335 rights granted to non-executive directors, which is exercisable from date of grant. Of these, 20,000 vested rights have been exercised during the year. |
The fair value of share appreciation rights granted to directors, officers, employees and non-employees of TEAL is estimated on the date of grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used for the grants made during the year:
| For the year ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
| (In thousands of United States Dollars) |
|
|
|
| |
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
% |
|
% |
| Risk-free interest rate |
4% |
|
4% |
| Expected volatility |
77% |
|
100% |
| Expected life (years) |
4 |
|
4 |
| Expected dividend yield |
0% |
|
0% |
|
| |
|
11.
|
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
|
| |
| |
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| Staff loans and advance |
132 |
|
23 |
| Other |
274 |
|
577 |
| |
406 |
|
600 |
|
| |
|
12.
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
| |
| |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
Net |
| |
Cost |
|
amortization |
|
book value |
| As at June 30, 2007 |
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| Land and buildings |
1,409 |
|
|
|
1,409 |
| Plant |
4,376 |
|
2 |
|
4,374 |
| Office furniture and computer equipment |
580 |
|
110 |
|
470 |
| Vehicles |
1,140 |
|
132 |
|
1,008 |
| |
7,505 |
|
244 |
|
7,261 |
| As at June 30, 2006 |
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| Office furniture and computer equipment |
125 |
|
19 |
|
106 |
| Vehicles |
213 |
|
26 |
|
187 |
| |
338 |
|
45 |
|
293 |
|
| |
|
13.
|
INCOME TAXES
|
| |
For the year ended June 30, 2007 (In thousands of United States Dollars)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
|
|
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| Normal taxation |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Canada |
|
|
|
|
| |
Barbados |
|
|
|
20 |
| |
South Africa |
|
159 |
|
27 |
| |
Zambia |
|
1 |
|
72 |
| |
Namibia |
|
|
|
|
| |
DRC |
|
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
163 |
|
119 |
Future income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s future income tax assets are as follows:
| |
|
Canada |
|
Barbados |
|
Zambia |
|
Namibia |
|
DRC |
| |
|
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| Future income tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net operating losses carry forwards |
|
(653) |
|
(40) |
|
(7,626) |
|
(10,486) |
|
(3,297) |
| Total future income tax assets |
|
(653) |
|
(40) |
|
(7,626) |
|
(10,486) |
|
(3,297) |
| Valuation allowance for future income tax assessment |
|
(653) |
|
(40) |
|
(7,626) |
|
(10,486) |
|
(3,297) |
| Net future income tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above amounts are estimated and have not been assessed and confirmed by the revenue authorities in the countries in which the Company operates.
In Canada, unused tax losses expire after seven years.
In Zambia, the unused income tax losses expire after ten years from the tax year in which the expenditure was incurred. For the future income tax assets calculated above, the majority of this expenditure was incurred from 1999 onwards.
In the other jurisdictions, the unused income tax losses do not expire.
The statutory income tax rates for mining companies in the various countries in which the Group operates, are:
| |
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
% |
|
% |
| Canada |
36.12 |
|
36.12 |
| Barbados |
2.5 |
|
2.5 |
| South Africa (branch of holding company) |
34 |
|
34 |
| Zambia |
35 |
|
25 |
| Namibia |
37.5 |
|
37.5 |
| DRC |
Up to 40 |
|
Up to 40 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
% |
|
% |
| The reconciliation of income tax attributable to operations computed at the statutory income tax rates to income tax expense/(recovery), using weighted average income tax rates are as follows: |
|
|
|
| Income tax at statutory rates |
(36.1) |
|
(36.1) |
| Expenses not deductible for income tax purposes |
4.1 |
|
7.9 |
| Revenue and unrealized gains not taxable |
(0.7) |
|
(7.8) |
| Assessed losses utilized |
|
|
24.0 |
| Valuation allowance against income tax assets |
30.9 |
|
13.8 |
| Effect due to different income tax rates |
(0.1) |
|
(3.1) |
| Effective rate of taxation |
(1.9) |
|
(1.3) |
|
| |
|
14.
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
| |
| |
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| ARM |
32 |
|
455 |
| |
32 |
|
455 |
The amount outstanding relates to services provided in terms of the shared services and office lease agreements and is stated at its carrying value. The amount is due on a 30 day account.
Shared Services Agreement
The Company entered into a shared services agreement with ARM on November 15, 2005. In terms of this agreement ARM will provide to TEAL and its subsidiaries risk management advice, cash management and investment services, accounting and financial services, human resources and other staffing services.
Office Lease Agreement
TEAL has an office lease agreement with an ARM subsidiary, Venture Building Trust.
Corporate Opportunity Agreement
On November 15, 2005, TEAL entered into a corporate opportunity agreement with ARM whereby it was agreed that all opportunities available to TEAL with respect to the acquisition of an interest in a project located within the Republic of South Africa shall be referred to ARM and all opportunities available to ARM with respect to the acquisition of an interest in a project located within the continent of Africa, excluding the Republic of South Africa and large scale projects, shall be referred to TEAL except for ferrous metal projects, coal and platinum group metals (PGM) projects.
Should TEAL determine that a project held by it is a ferrous metal project, coal or a PGM project as a result of exploration work, then where TEAL has not incurred expenditures in excess of US$1,000,000, the project shall be offered to ARM in consideration of two times such expenditures, and where TEAL has incurred expenditure in excess of US$1,000,000, ARM shall be offered a Joint Venture Agreement with respect to the project. Should ARM fail to give notice of its acceptance of such offer within 30 days, then TEAL may further explore, develop, produce minerals from, sell and otherwise deal with the project without further reference to this agreement.
Maintenance Agreement
TEAL and ARM entered into a maintenance agreement dated November 15, 2005 (the Maintenance Agreement) pursuant to which ARM was granted the right (the Maintenance Right), subject to applicable law, to participate in future offerings and other issuances of common shares or securities convertible into common shares (subject to certain exceptions, including the issue of common shares pursuant to the Offering or on the exercise, conversion or exchange of any previously issued securities convertible into common shares or rights issued in a rights offering) by purchasing that number of securities in the offering necessary for ARM to maintain its relative percentage beneficial ownership of common shares (on a fully-diluted basis in the case of an offering of convertible securities). The Maintenance Right is exercisable by ARM, from time to time, at any time during a period of ten business days following receipt of a triggering event notice until the date ARM ceases to beneficially own at least 35% of TEALs outstanding common shares.
In exercising its Maintenance Right, ARM must acquire its securities on the same terms and conditions as third party subscribers, subject to any applicable stock exchange or securities regulatory authority requirements. ARM must exercise the Maintenance Right to maintain its percentage beneficial holding of common shares at the level established, from time to time, by the South African Reserve Bank (SARB), currently 50% plus one of the issued and outstanding common shares, in order not to trigger the SARB requirement for ARM to sell all of its common shares.
Bridging loan facility
TEAL and ARM entered into an interim loan agreement on May 14, 2007 in terms of which ARM will advance to TEAL funds on an ad hoc basis. A total of US$2,600,000m in South African Rands equivalent was advanced during May and June 2007 and the full amount inclusive of interest (which amounted to US$22,000) at South Africa prime (12.5%) was repaid to ARM on June 12, 2007, with funds raised on the Standard Chartered loan facility.
Guarantee
In terms of the loan facility between TEAL and Standard Chartered Bank (refer
note 7), ARM provided an irrevocable and unconditional guarantee to Standard Chartered Bank for the punctual payment and performance to Standard Chartered Bank of all monies, obligations and liabilities owing by TEAL to Standard Chartered Bank.
|
| |
|
15.
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
| |
| a) |
In terms of an agreement dated March 6, 1997 among Zambia Consolidated Copper Mines Limited (now ZCCM-IH), Avmin Limited, a subsidiary of ARM, Konnoco Zambia Limited (Konnoco) and the Government of Zambia, Konnoco acquired the Konkola North Copper Project in consideration of an initial payment on signing of US$500,000, additional payments which have been made, totalling US$500,000 upon the commencement of a feasibility study and the commitment to pay a further US$7,500,000 upon the taking of a development decision after the completion of a final feasibility study. Konnoco undertook to spend certain amounts to complete a pre-feasibility study, which the Company has done, and produce a feasibility study within a further 24 to 48 months. In terms of an amending agreement dated September 19, 2005, the parties agreed to extend the date on which Konnoco was required to produce a final feasibility study until the earlier of the date that is 24 months following the closing of the Offering and November 30, 2007.
Should a feasibility study be completed and a mine development decision be taken by Konnoco,then TEAL will be obligated to subscribe for that number of new Konnoco shares so as to equity finance one third of the total financing requirements for mine development and, as well, settle all inter-Company loans between Konnoco and TEAL. Thereafter, ZCCM-IH has the right to a 15% or 20% equity interest in Konnoco, of which 5% shall be a free-carried interest. ZCCM-IHs residual 10% or 15% respectively, paying equity interest will obligate ZCCM-IH to fund its share of equity to develop a mine, although ZCCM-IH may elect to be debt funded by TEAL at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 4.5% (should ZCCM-IH elect to have a 15% interest) or a fixed rate of 20% (should ZCCM-IH elect to have a 20% interest).
|
| b) |
In terms of an agreement made May 6, 2003 between TEAL Mining (DRC) s.p.r.l (TEAL Mining), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and Gécamines, Gécamines agreed to contribute all of the mining rights to the area located within the Kasonta-Lupoto Polygon (an area now known as Permits dExploitation No. 2590) to Kalumines, a corporation owned 60% by TEAL Mining and 40% by Gécamines. On August 18, 2005, Gécamines and TEAL Mining agreed that TEAL Mining would submit a feasibility study before May 2007, which is a condition to TEAL Minings right to maintain its interest in Kalumines. Thereafter, TEAL Mining must arrange all financing for the development of a mine should a development decision be taken. Royalty payments of between 3% and 4.5% of gross sales must be made upon the commencement of production. TEAL Mining has the right to appoint a majority of members to the board of Kalumines and to any management committee established.
|
| c) |
The Company is committed to future minimum annual rent payments
under operating lease agreements over the next five years as follows:
| |
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| 2008 |
131 |
|
181 |
| 2009 |
107 |
|
172 |
| 2010 |
117 |
|
107 |
| 2011 |
50 |
|
117 |
| 2012 |
|
|
50 |
| |
405 |
|
627 |
|
d)
|
Commitments in respect of capital expenditure
|
| |
| |
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| |
|
|
|
| Approved by the directors |
|
|
|
| contracted for |
1,660 |
|
|
| not contracted for |
2,000 |
|
1,350 |
| |
3,660 |
|
1,350 |
|
|
| |
|
16.
|
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
|
| |
| a) |
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Otjikoto Gold Project |
| |
Discussions with the broad-based Namibian stakeholder grouping, EVI Mining Company Limited (EVI), to enable EVI to acquire a 10% equity interest in TEALs wholly-owned Namibian affiliate company, Avdale Namibia (Pty) Limited, will be proressed to a conclusion over the coming months.
|
| b) |
Additional bridging finance facility |
| |
The group has secured a one year bridging loan facility with Standard Chartered Bank for US$20,000,000 which is being guaranteed by TEALs major shareholder, ARM and is repayable on May 23, 2008. Subsequent to year-end, ARM has agreed to increase the guarantee to $50 million, subject to South African Reserve Bank approval, which will ensure that TEAL has a facility in place beyond the end of the 2008 financial year or until long-term funding is arranged, TEAL is currently negotiating the terms including an extension beyond the one-year time-frame, with Standard Chartered Bank. The funds will be directed mainly towards work supporting studies on TEALs major projects thereby creating sufficient flexibility for the company to maximize value from its existing portfolio, specifically: the Konkola North copper mine and Kalumines mine and smelter copper projects, as well as the Otjikoto Gold Project. Appropriate funding to refinance the bridging facilities and fund the developmental expenditure at Konkola North, Kalumines and Otjikoto will be arranged after the completion of each of the respective final feasibility studies. |
|
| |
|
17.
|
NOTES TO THE CASH FLOW STATEMENT
|
| |
| |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
| |
|
$ 000 |
|
$ 000 |
| a) |
Taxation paid |
|
|
|
| |
Balance at the beginning of the year |
119 |
|
|
| |
Current taxation as per income statement |
|
|
|
| |
Normal taxation |
163 |
|
119 |
| |
Balance at the end of the year |
(186) |
|
(119) |
| |
Taxation paid |
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b)
|
Acquisition of subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
| |
In November 2005, the Company acquired the common shares and other assets of ARMs non-South Africa mineral and exploration interests. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The following assets and liabilities were acquired: |
|
|
|
| |
Capital assets |
|
|
33 |
| |
Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses |
|
|
64 |
| |
Accounts payable and provisions |
|
|
(646) |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
48 |
| |
Net liabilities |
|
|
(501) |
| |
Purchase price (in cash) |
|
|
(575) |
| |
Deficit arising on acquisition |
|
|
(1,076) |
| |
Cash acquired |
|
|
48 |
| |
Cash purchase price |
|
|
(575) |
| |
Net cash paid on acquisition |
|
|
(527) |
| |
|
|
|
|
| c) |
Interest paid |
|
|
|
| |
Balance at the beginning of the year |
|
|
|
| |
Interest paid charge as per income statement |
45 |
|
|
| |
Balance at the end of the year |
(22) |
|
|
| |
Interest paid |
23 |
|
|
|